My Thoughts on Reading the First Fifteen Chapters:
In
 the fairy world of Harley Street, London, where Titania curls up, 
asleep on the chesterfield, Margaret Hale inhabits a world pleasure and 
ease, where friends are defined as the people you dine with more 
frequently than any others, and emotions are never so strong that they 
cannot be appeased with a culinary delicacy.  But, under the superficial
 veneer of perfection, we see a world in which a nine-year-old girl, 
separated from her parents for the first time must muffle her homesick 
sobs uncomforted.  Margaret, surrounded by an assortment of frivolous 
behaviour is a model of balanced thinking and clear perception, keeping 
the fairy tale alive, and her individually intact (although subdued).  
She is in tune with all that goes on around her and constantly fills in 
the gaps in courtesy created by her aunt and cousin: she sees when the 
guests have been left unattended, and rises unbidden to be a page-turner
 while Edith plays the piano.  The poor country cousin, she has lived in
 Harley Street as a companion to Edith for many years.  Now, Edith is to
 be married to Captain Lennox and will be living in Greece; Margaret 
will return to her parents' home in Helstone.
Helstone,
 as described by Margaret is like a village in a Tennyson poem; a small 
parish in the New Forest, too sacred and special for her to discuss 
flippantly with Mr. Henry Lennox, the brother of Edith's fiance, who 
teases her about it's fairy tale qualities.  When she returns to 
Helstone from London, Margaret revels in the outdoor world and enjoys 
long walks with her father; she visits with the local inhabitants and 
has freedoms she could not enjoy in the city.  But like Harley Street, 
the life in Helstone is couched in the language of fairy tales; Dixon, 
lady's maid to Mrs. Hale considers herself "the good and protecting 
fairy whose duty it was to baffle the malignant giant, Mr. Hale." (21)
In
 Harley Street we have glimpsed Margaret's self-restraint (in contrast 
with the behaviour of impulsive Edith), but when she returns to Helstone
 it is challenged in quick succession by an unwanted marriage proposal, 
and the revelation that her father is giving up his livelihood as an 
Anglican minister and relocating the family to a northern industrial 
town.  While Mr. Hale, dithering and indecisive, desires a change in 
external surroundings to distract him from the challenges of his 
decision, Margaret is able to draw on her own inner strength and resolve
 and to accept his decision.  Emotionally orphaned by her parents, 
Margaret is nevertheless able to move forward.  In one day, Margaret has
 made the transition from girl to woman (by a marriage proposal), and 
from child to adult, with all the responsibilities that entails.  She 
now joins the other adults indoors, her life of freedom in nature has 
been left behind. It is only through her strength of mind that she is 
able to survive this transition.  Lack of moral fortitude and 
self-control is exhibited by each of her parents in turn and serves as 
contrast for Margaret's strength of character.
Margaret
 is not without her doubts and anxieties, however.  In the privacy of 
her bedroom, she is able to go over all her thoughts about her day, the 
proposal, and her father's resignation from the church.  It is here, 
alone, that she is able to get in touch with her darkest fears.  This is
 Margaret's Dark Night of the Soul:
That
 morning when she had looked out, her heart had danced at seeing the 
bright clear lights on the church tower, which foretold a fine and sunny
 day.  This evening - sixteen hours at most had passed by - she sat 
down, too full of sorrow to cry, but with a dull cold pain, which seemed
 to have pressed the youth and buoyancy out of her heart, never to 
return. [...] She looked out upon the dark-gray lines of the church 
tower, square and straight in the centre of the view, cutting against 
the deep blue transparent depths beyond, into which she gazed, and felt 
that she might gaze for ever, seeing at every moment some farther 
distance, and yet no sign of God!  It seemed to her at that moment, as 
if the earth was more utterly desolate than if girt in by an iron dome, 
behind which there might be the ineffaceable peace and glory of the 
Almighty: those never-ending depths of space, in their still serenity, 
were more mocking to her than any material bounds could be - shutting in
 the cries of earth's sufferers, which now might ascend into that 
infinite splendour of vastness and be lost - lost for ever, before they 
reached His throne. (40)
Closed off, even 
temporarily from the comfort of her spirituality, and her religious 
faith, Margaret is also challenged by her isolation in society.  She 
realizes the implications of her father's resignation: they will no 
longer be accepted by their familiar society, either in Helstone, or in 
Harley Street.  One night whilst walking in the garden, Margaret sees 
the poachers who roam the New Forest in the dark.  In the past "the wild
 adventurous freedom of their life had taken her fancy," but this night 
she is very afraid.  She is entering a dark forest of her own as she 
leaves Helstone, and like the poachers will be outside the bounds of 
law-abiding, socially-acceptable, church-approved society that is her 
familiar home.  They will have to make their own rules and set their own
 boundaries in a foreign and (perceived) hostile environment.  As a 
child, the freedom and excitement of the poacher's life thrilled her; 
now, as an adult, she recognizes the dangers that come with such a 
life.  When she is very nearly locked outdoors in the dark, she fears 
her imminent exclusion from acceptable society.
But 
onward they must move, and Margaret maintains her role, and controlling 
her behaviour so well that the servants assume she does not have any 
strong feelings about Helstone, although her heart is breaking.  It is 
Margaret who makes all the arrangements for the move, taking the 
leadership role from her parents who have abdicated all their 
responsibilities.  In the transition from Helstone (Heaven) to 
Milton-Northern (Hell) is a short stay in Heston (Purgatory) where they 
are able to live fully in the present, where Margaret sits and rests, 
walks on the beach.  But although these Elysian Fields are enticing, she
 must continue to move forward.  On the train approaching Milton, they 
see the "deep lead-coloured cloud hanging over the horizon in the 
direction in which it lay," (55) and Margaret is trepidatious but 
stolid.
The dark cloud over Milton foreshadows the 
darkness and gloom that will surround them as they settle in to their 
new home.  The fog surrounds them, pressing in upon them, and the 
stupour and sense of isolation that results increases the potential for 
lethargy.  The potential for everyone to sink into a deep lethargy and 
depression is very real.  Mrs. Hale has no inner strength upon which to 
call in these times of difficult transition.  Her fondest attributes 
have been her status and her beauty.  When these fail to support her she
 begins to collapse.  However, Mr. Hale is energized by his interactions
 with his pupils, the bustle of commerce, the machinery of industry and 
the men of power.  Margaret too, reminded of Henry Lennox's ability to 
change his thoughts, to put negative thoughts away from himself, begins 
to venture forth, and feels more comfortable in Milton when she meets 
local factory workers Nicholas Higgins and his daughter Bessy.  Home is 
where the heart is, and for Gaskell, and for 
Margaret, the bonds of the heart are formed by connections made with 
people.
Until this point, we have gotten to know 
Margaret through her actions and her thoughts.  While still in Helstone,
 Elizabeth Gaskell had described Margaret's appearance ironically, 
comparing her to a subservient beauty:
Her mouth was wide; no rosebud 
that could only open just enough to let out a 'yes' or 'no,' and 'an't 
please you, sir.'  But the wide mouth was one soft curve of rich red 
lips; and the skin, if not white and fair, was of an ivory smoothness 
and delicacy.  If the look on her face was, in general, too dignified 
and reserved for one so young, now, talking to her father, it was bright
 as the morning, - full of dimples, and glances that spoke of childish 
gladness, and boundless hope in the future." (17-18) 
For
 the first time, we now see Margaret from the perspective of a 
stranger.  In Milton, she meets Mr. Thornton, a mill-owner with whom Mr.
 Hale has formed a connection.  When Margaret and Mr. Thornton are 
thrown together unexpectedly, we see a different Margaret.  He is 
over-awed by her undeniable beauty, by her social graces and her simple 
elegance.  "Mr Thornton was in habits of authority himself, but she 
seemed to assume some kind of rule over him at once," for:
Margaret
 could not help her looks; but the short curled upper lip, the round, 
massive up-turned chin, the manner of carrying her head, her movements, 
full of a soft feminine defiance, always gave strangers the impression 
of haughtiness. (58)
Margaret, on the other hand,
 is dismissive of Mr. Thornton, although she does notice that he is 
"sagacious and strong, as becomes a great tradesman."  Her prejudice of 
what she calls "shoppy people" is clear.  However, she is able to see in
 his attitude a man "of resolution and power."  Ironically, she has seen
 him at a moment of uncharacteristic weakness.
Veering 
again from the predominant point of view of the Hales, Elizabeth Gaskell
 changes perspective, and takes us inside the Thornton home as Mr. 
Thornton prepares to visit the Hales for tea.  In a home that reflects 
the well-ordered and disciplined lives of the inhabitants, the books lie
 in careful arrangement and the surfaces are clean and well-polished.  
Mrs. Thornton and her son both share the same decisive step, just as 
they share the same hard resolve and uncompromising focus.  Their 
relationship is open, honest and easy - everything Margaret's 
relationship with her mother is not.  This contrast continues as 
Thornton enters the Hale home and sees the graceful cares and hominess 
that his own austere and showy home lacks. 
Margaret 
has more opportunity to observe Mr. Thornton and although she finds that
 she "liked his smile," she is at odds with his defence of free market 
economics and his rejection of the way of life in southern England as 
indolent.  Mr. Thornton believes in a free market, one in which the 
market, free from legislative interference will find it's own balance.  
He has a perspective on the industry that none of the Hales have.  He 
claims that "the power of masters and men became more evenly balanced; 
and now the battle is pretty fairly waged between us." (78) And the 
war-time terminology is apt, although the Hales are not comfortable with
 his discussion in terms of outright class battle.  To illustrate his 
economic theories he uses his own life as an example of how, by 
self-denial and good habits he has risen to a place of authority in 
Milton society.  His life story, although more dramatic, and more tragic
 parallels the transition Margaret has just made, with the loss of all 
that was important to him, and the necessity "to become a man (as well 
as I could) in a few days." (78)
North and South is a 
kind of inverted fairy tale.  From her place in refined and educated 
London society, Margaret is removed through no fault of her own, and 
ends up in a very different life that involves work as a scullery maid, 
doing the laundry in a pokey kitchen.  Mr. Thornton has definite ideas 
about the power of self-denial and hard work resulting in an elevation 
of "authority and order."  the Hale's loss of social status can be 
equated with Thornton's own disgrace when he was removed from school and
 had to become a wage-earner for his mother and sister.
  | 
| Elizabeth Gaskell | 
A deeply ingrained sense of responsibility is a 
central characteristic of Margaret's socialism, and is the focus of her 
debate with Mr. Thornton about his workers.  He fails to see, as she 
does, that as a recipient of his mother's wisdom and good teaching that 
he has a duty to pass these skills along to his workers.  As a 
capitalist, he is more inclined to see that he and his workers are in an
 economic relationship for the duration of their working hours, and that
 he bears no responsibility for them afterwards. This, he claims, is 
none of his business.  If the workers were only to apply themselves, 
they too could rise to positions of authority.  Margaret asserts this as
 a moral responsibility (invoking Biblical teaching), although not 
perhaps a legal one, while Thornton looks to the rules of capitalist 
economics for his guidelines.
If the industrial workers
 are treated as children, Margaret believes they will remain infantile 
in their development, but if the mill owners, and others in authority 
were to act as mentors, to teach the skills of self-denial, and 
discipline, then they would stand more chance of elevation.  To 
re-enforce the point beyond demonstrating the obvious examples amongst 
the mill owners and the workers, Elizabeth Gaskell gives Mr. Thornton 
the most weak-willed, the most frivolous, petty and silly sister it is 
possible to imagine.  In the character of Fanny Thornton we see 
Elizabeth Gaskell's argument for the necessity of offering a guiding 
light to those without internal strength of character.  Raised by the 
same domineering mother, John and Fanny Thornton are the products of 
both their own natures, and the influence of their powerful mother.  
Whereas she taught all these skills of discipline and self-denial to her
 son, she had abdicated her responsibilities for teaching Fanny.  She 
had accepted that Fanny was weak-willed and:
she
 felt instinctively that nothing could strengthen Fanny to endure 
hardships patiently, or face difficulties bravely; and though she winced
 as she made this acknowledgement to herself about her daughter, it only
 gave her a kind of pitying tenderness of manner towards her; much of 
the same description of demeanour with which mothers are wont to treat 
their weak and sickly children.
 If Mrs. Thornton
 had only exposed Fanny to the same rigorous upbringing, as she did for 
her more loved son, perhaps she could have overcome some of her natural 
defaults and been a person of more depth and less impulsive frivolity 
and weakness.
Illness as a manifestation of this 
weakness of character is demonstrated in the character of Mrs. Hale, 
who, unable to adapt to the changed circumstances of their new life in 
Milton has no inner resources left and literally cannot stand on her own
 feet.  The illness experienced by Bessy Higgins, the cotton worker 
Margaret be-friends, is not however a matter of her own individual 
weakness so much as an indication of the weakness of the system that 
caused her illness.  Like the peasants trampled under the feet of the 
triumphal returning generals, the Industrial Revolution has it's own 
innocent victims.  Getting to know Bessy greatly influences Margaret's 
attitudes toward the economic system she sees as responsible for her 
friend's illness.
It is also hearing the details of her
 brother Frederick's exile that re-enforces for Margaret the importance 
of her socialism, and her Christian moralism.  Frederick had been 
convicted of mutiny aboard his naval vessel, and fearing for his life 
had fled the country.  He had lived many years abroad, finally settling 
in Spain.  It is the main tenent of the Hale family that:
Loyalty
 and obedience to wisdom and justice are fine; but it is still finer to 
defy arbitrary power, unjustly and cruelly used - not on behalf of 
ourselves, but on behalf of others more helpless. (100)
Helping
 the helpless is also a central tenent of Christ, and as Margaret nurses
 both Bessy and her mother and encourages Thornton to do the same with 
his workers, she is bolstered to hear the story of her brother who made 
such a courageous sacrifice for the weaker members of his crew.
These are my thoughts, such as they are as I read the first quarter section of 
North and South.  I am thoroughly enjoying Elizabeth Gaskell's writing.  There is much to ponder in every short chapter.
(Please see here for my thoughts on 
Part Two)